On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:05:16PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 12:29 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:05:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > The earlier comment says th
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 12:29 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:05:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > The earlier comment says that errno values go in op->err.
> > > However all implementations (NetB
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:05:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > The earlier comment says that errno values go in op->err.
> > However all implementations (NetBSD, Linux) of the most
> > common operations use XEN_PCI_ERR_* instead o
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:58 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> The earlier comment says that errno values go in op->err.
> However all implementations (NetBSD, Linux) of the most
> common operations use XEN_PCI_ERR_* instead of -EXX values.
>
> The exception is the xen-pciback in Linux code whe
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:58:32AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> The earlier comment says that errno values go in op->err.
> However all implementations (NetBSD, Linux) of the most
> common operations use XEN_PCI_ERR_* instead of -EXX values.
>
> The exception is the xen-pciback in Linux c
The earlier comment says that errno values go in op->err.
However all implementations (NetBSD, Linux) of the most
common operations use XEN_PCI_ERR_* instead of -EXX values.
The exception is the xen-pciback in Linux code when doing
XEN_PCI_OP_enable_msix can stash the -EXX in op->result
and in op-
