On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 11:54 +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>
> Jan is right. When the assertion fails, the value of gfn is 0xfee00.
>
> Do you mean that is_iomem_page() is equal to direct_mmio except some
> corner cases such as APIC access MFN and INVALID_MFN( any others? ) ?
That was the hypothesis, an
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:56:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.02.17 at 09:27, wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:05:38AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.02.17 at 08:31, wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:38 PM
>>>
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 01:56 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> > index 86c71be..3d9386a 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
> > @@ -784,6 +784,8 @@ int epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned
>>> On 09.02.17 at 09:27, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:05:38AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.02.17 at 08:31, wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:38 PM
>>> On 06.02.17 at 15:48, wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-0
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:05:38AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.02.17 at 08:31, wrote:
>>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:38 PM
>>>
>>> >>> On 06.02.17 at 15:48, wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 07:26 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> >
>>> On 08.02.17 at 08:31, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:38 PM
>>
>> >>> On 06.02.17 at 15:48, wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 07:26 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On 06.02.17 at 14:55, wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 11:38 PM
>
> >>> On 06.02.17 at 15:48, wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 07:26 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 06.02.17 at 14:55, wrote:
> >> > Switch its return type to bool to mat
>>> On 06.02.17 at 15:48, wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 07:26 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 06.02.17 at 14:55, wrote:
>> > Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the
>> > ARM
>> > implementation slightly.
>> >
>> > No functional change.
>>
On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 07:26 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 06.02.17 at 14:55, wrote:
> > Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the
> > ARM
> > implementation slightly.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> Reviewe
>>> On 06.02.17 at 14:55, wrote:
> Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the ARM
> implementation slightly.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
And perhaps that's what should be used in epte_get_entry_emt()
instead of !m
On 06/02/17 13:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the ARM
> implementation slightly.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: George Dunlap
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Tim Deegan
> CC: George Dunlap
> CC: S
Hi Andrew,
On 06/02/17 13:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the ARM
implementation slightly.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: Julien Grall
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
__
Switch its return type to bool to match its use, and simplify the ARM
implementation slightly.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Tim Deegan
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
---
xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 6 ++
xen/arch
13 matches
Mail list logo
