Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: vgic: Clarify some comments after 5d495f4

2016-01-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:29 +, Julien Grall wrote: > Ian pointed out that the definition of "offset" and "appropriate > boundary" in the comments added by "xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to > store the target vCPU in the rank" were not cleared. > > Clarify them by explicitly mentionning the o

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: vgic: Clarify some comments after 5d495f4

2015-12-17 Thread Julien Grall
Ian pointed out that the definition of "offset" and "appropriate boundary" in the comments added by "xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to store the target vCPU in the rank" were not cleared. Clarify them by explicitly mentionning the offset is in byte and the appropriate boundary is ITARGET/IROUTER