On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:01:27 +
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/02/15 21:06, Don Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:08:46 +
> > Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >
[...]
> > I'm surprised that coverity didn't complain about the fallthrough in
> > the next case:
> >
> > case TASKLET_scheduled:
>
On 12/02/15 21:06, Don Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:08:46 +
> Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
>> Coverity uses several heuristics to identify when one case statement
>> legitimately falls through into the next, and a comment as the final item in
>> a
>> case statement is one heuristic (the ass
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:08:46 +
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Coverity uses several heuristics to identify when one case statement
> legitimately falls through into the next, and a comment as the final item in a
> case statement is one heuristic (the assumption being that it is a
> justification for
Coverity uses several heuristics to identify when one case statement
legitimately falls through into the next, and a comment as the final item in a
case statement is one heuristic (the assumption being that it is a
justification for the fallthrough).
Use this to perform an audit of defects and hid
