>>> On 15.02.16 at 14:39, wrote:
> On 15/02/16 12:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -4542,9 +4542,10 @@ x86_emulate(
>>
>> case 0xbc: /* bsf or tzcnt */ {
>> bool_t zf;
>> -asm ( "bsf %2,%0; setz %b1"
>> +
>> +asm ( "bsf %2,%0; setz %1"
>>: "=r" (dst.val)
On 15/02/16 12:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Let's give the compiler as much liberty in picking instruction operands
> as possible. Also drop unnecessary size modifiers when the correct size
> can already be derived from the asm() operands. Finally also drop an
> "unsigned" from idiv_dbl()'s second para
Let's give the compiler as much liberty in picking instruction operands
as possible. Also drop unnecessary size modifiers when the correct size
can already be derived from the asm() operands. Finally also drop an
"unsigned" from idiv_dbl()'s second parameter, allowing a cast to be
eliminated.
Sign
