>>> On 12.06.17 at 17:03, wrote:
> On 12/06/17 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.06.17 at 14:41, wrote:
>>> On 12/06/17 07:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
As a side note, I'm removing these here since the further
SIMD emulation patches I have ready, but would prefer to
post only once 4.
On 12/06/17 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.06.17 at 14:41, wrote:
>> On 12/06/17 07:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.06.17 at 19:50, wrote:
On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
> fix.insn_bytes adjustments
>>> On 12.06.17 at 14:41, wrote:
> On 12/06/17 07:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.06.17 at 19:50, wrote:
>>> On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
i
On 12/06/17 07:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.06.17 at 19:50, wrote:
>> On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
>>> fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
>>> invocations when the instruction placed in
>>> On 09.06.17 at 19:50, wrote:
> On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
>> fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
>> invocations when the instruction placed in the stub can't raise #XF)
>
> I'm not sur
On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
> fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
> invocations when the instruction placed in the stub can't raise #XF)
I'm not sure these are wise to remove. Even if we don
Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
invocations when the instruction placed in the stub can't raise #XF)
plus a corresponding check_xmm_exn() invocation.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x
