Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH] x86emul: correct stub invocation constraints
again"):
> While the hypervisor side of commit cd91ab08ea ("x86emul: correct stub
> invocation constraints") was fine, the tools side triggered a bogus
> error with old gcc (4.3 and 4.4 at least). Use a slightly less
> appro
On 04/27/2017 04:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While the hypervisor side of commit cd91ab08ea ("x86emul: correct stub
> invocation constraints") was fine, the tools side triggered a bogus
> error with old gcc (4.3 and 4.4 at least). Use a slightly less
> appropriate variant instead, proven to be good
On 27/04/2017 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While the hypervisor side of commit cd91ab08ea ("x86emul: correct stub
> invocation constraints") was fine, the tools side triggered a bogus
> error with old gcc (4.3 and 4.4 at least). Use a slightly less
> appropriate variant instead, proven to be good en
While the hypervisor side of commit cd91ab08ea ("x86emul: correct stub
invocation constraints") was fine, the tools side triggered a bogus
error with old gcc (4.3 and 4.4 at least). Use a slightly less
appropriate variant instead, proven to be good enough to not
re-introduce the original problem: W
