On 11/12/15 13:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is to limit symbol table growth, which would be quite a bit worse
> if we went with the "label every unlikely sub-section contribution"
> approach proposed previously.
>
> Older gas doesn't support quoted symbols, yet the result looks quite
> bit better
This is to limit symbol table growth, which would be quite a bit worse
if we went with the "label every unlikely sub-section contribution"
approach proposed previously.
Older gas doesn't support quoted symbols, yet the result looks quite
bit better that way. Hence two variants get introduced, one