Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: correct PT_NOTE file position

2016-09-02 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 24/08/16 21:45, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:24:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Program and section headers disagreed about the file offset at which >> the build ID note lives. > Gosh. That was an oversight. >> Reported-by: Sylvain Munaut > 'whatever-company'? Rea

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: correct PT_NOTE file position

2016-08-24 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:24:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > Program and section headers disagreed about the file offset at which > the build ID note lives. Gosh. That was an oversight. > > Reported-by: Sylvain Munaut 'whatever-company'? Really? Huh. Imagine that. > Signed-off-by: Jan Beuli

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: correct PT_NOTE file position

2016-08-24 Thread Jan Beulich
Program and section headers disagreed about the file offset at which the build ID note lives. Reported-by: Sylvain Munaut Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/mkelf32.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/mkelf32.c @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) note_phdr.p_paddr