>>> On 18.04.17 at 17:47, wrote:
> Move microcode loading earlier for the boot CPU and secondary CPUs so
> that it takes place before identify_cpu() is called for each CPU.
> Without this, the detected features may be wrong if the new microcode
> loading adjusts the feature bits. That could mean t
Hi Andrew,
On 19/04/17 12:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/04/17 16:47, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
Move microcode loading earlier for the boot CPU and secondary CPUs so
that it takes place before identify_cpu() is called for each CPU.
Without this, the detected features may be wrong if the new microco
On 18/04/17 16:47, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Move microcode loading earlier for the boot CPU and secondary CPUs so
> that it takes place before identify_cpu() is called for each CPU.
> Without this, the detected features may be wrong if the new microcode
> loading adjusts the feature bits. That could
Move microcode loading earlier for the boot CPU and secondary CPUs so
that it takes place before identify_cpu() is called for each CPU.
Without this, the detected features may be wrong if the new microcode
loading adjusts the feature bits. That could mean that some fixes (e.g.
d6e9f8d4f35d ("x86/vm
