On 18/12/15 10:50, Huaitong Han wrote:
> The check needs to be against the xsave header in the area, rather than
> Xen's maximum xfeature_mask. A guest might easily have a smaller xcr0
> than the maximum Xen is willing to allow, causing the pointer below to
> be bogus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huaitong H
The check needs to be against the xsave header in the area, rather than
Xen's maximum xfeature_mask. A guest might easily have a smaller xcr0
than the maximum Xen is willing to allow, causing the pointer below to
be bogus.
Signed-off-by: Huaitong Han
---
xen/arch/x86/xstate.c | 7 ---
1 file
