>>> On 15.07.15 at 11:48, wrote:
> On 15/07/15 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.07.15 at 19:54, wrote:
>>> @@ -626,8 +626,9 @@ static void do_trap(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int
> use_error_code)
>>>
>>> if ( likely((fixup = search_exception_table(regs->eip)) != 0) )
>>> {
>>>
On 15/07/15 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.07.15 at 19:54, wrote:
>> @@ -626,8 +626,9 @@ static void do_trap(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int
>> use_error_code)
>>
>> if ( likely((fixup = search_exception_table(regs->eip)) != 0) )
>> {
>> -dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Trap %d: %p
>>> On 14.07.15 at 19:54, wrote:
> @@ -626,8 +626,9 @@ static void do_trap(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int
> use_error_code)
>
> if ( likely((fixup = search_exception_table(regs->eip)) != 0) )
> {
> -dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Trap %d: %p -> %p\n",
> -trapnr, _p(regs
* Reword the printk() in do_guest_trap() to avoid
"Unhandled general protection fault fault/trap"
* Drop irrelevant file/line references.
* Make some of the text more concise.
* A trap with an extable entry does not warrant an error level message.
* Use %ps for extable sources to provide extra
