At 11:38 +0100 on 23 Apr (1429789126), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Modifiers to the pointer passed into list_next_entry() are also being
> applied to the macro's return type, and hence if the input pointer is
> const-qualified a variable the result gets assigned to would also need
> to be. As that doesn't
Modifiers to the pointer passed into list_next_entry() are also being
applied to the macro's return type, and hence if the input pointer is
const-qualified a variable the result gets assigned to would also need
to be. As that doesn't seem desirable here, drop the const qualifier
on the input pointe
