On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
> without also logging function names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: George Dunlap
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
> @@ -469,8
On 01/09/16 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.08.16 at 20:39, wrote:
>> On 24/08/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
>>> without also logging function names.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>>
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.
>>> On 31.08.16 at 20:39, wrote:
> On 24/08/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
>> without also logging function names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
>> @@ -469
On 24/08/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
> without also logging function names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
> @@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static int paging_log_dirty_op(
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:01:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
> without also logging function names.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm
Non-debugging message text should be (and is here) distinguishable
without also logging function names.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/paging.c
@@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static int paging_log_dirty_op(struct do
peek = 0;
if ( unlikely(d-
