Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mem_sharing: Relax sanity check for memops

2015-06-23 Thread Andres Lagar Cavilla
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing > memops. > > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel > --- > xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_s

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mem_sharing: Relax sanity check for memops

2015-05-29 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 29.05.15 at 11:37, wrote: > > The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing > > memops. > > If indeed so, why would the same not apply to mem_paging memops? > > Jan > The ring during mem_sharing is only us

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mem_sharing: Relax sanity check for memops

2015-05-29 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 29.05.15 at 11:37, wrote: > The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing > memops. If indeed so, why would the same not apply to mem_paging memops? Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mem_sharing: Relax sanity check for memops

2015-05-29 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
The sharing vm_event ring being enabled is not necessary for mem_sharing memops. Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel --- xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c index 0700f00..16e329e 100644 ---