On 02/03/2016 10:05 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 3/2/16 a les 15:30, Boris Ostrovsky ha escrit:
On 02/03/2016 03:43 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 3/2/16 a les 1:17, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
I think for now I mostly care about APIC and for that I c
El 3/2/16 a les 15:30, Boris Ostrovsky ha escrit:
> On 02/03/2016 03:43 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 3/2/16 a les 1:17, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
>>> On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
I think for now I mostly care about APIC and for that I can use HW
CPUID bit (which I be
On 02/03/2016 09:37 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 03/02/16 14:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
One might say that in Linux we have APIC even for PV guests
--- we provide PV APIC ops. That's what I am using as justification
for stating that the HVMlite guest has APIC to force-set
X86_FEATURE_APIC bit. S
On 03/02/16 14:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 03:43 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 3/2/16 a les 1:17, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
>>> On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
I think for now I mostly care about APIC and for that I can use HW
CPUID bit (which I believe is
On 02/03/2016 03:43 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 3/2/16 a les 1:17, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
I think for now I mostly care about APIC and for that I can use HW
CPUID bit (which I believe is cleared for HVMlite guests).
The APIC bit in cpuid is magi
El 3/2/16 a les 1:17, Andrew Cooper ha escrit:
> On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2016 23:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Hypervisor may choose which features to emulate for HVMlite guests.
Guest will query the HVM CPUID l
> From: Boris Ostrovsky
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 7:17 AM
> To: jbeul...@suse.com; andrew.coop...@citrix.com; k...@xen.org
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky; roger@citrix.com; david.vra...@citrix.com;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: Provid
On 02/02/2016 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/02/2016 23:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Hypervisor may choose which features to emulate for HVMlite guests.
>>> Guest will query the HVM CPUID leaf to find out what is available.
>>>
>>> Signed-off
On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/02/2016 23:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Hypervisor may choose which features to emulate for HVMlite guests.
Guest will query the HVM CPUID leaf to find out what is available.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Roger also submitted a patch to do thi
On 02/02/2016 23:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Hypervisor may choose which features to emulate for HVMlite guests.
> Guest will query the HVM CPUID leaf to find out what is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Roger also submitted a patch to do this. However, it is not
appropriate, so wa
Hypervisor may choose which features to emulate for HVMlite guests.
Guest will query the HVM CPUID leaf to find out what is available.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
Another option to expose this is via features interface. The advantage of using
cpuid
is that we don't need to setup hypercal
11 matches
Mail list logo
