>>> On 31.05.17 at 16:14, wrote:
> Update hpet_broadcast_{enter,exit}() to use this_cpu() rather than per_cpu()
> for clarity,
I'm afraid this makes things worse in other respects (see below).
> @@ -697,8 +696,9 @@ void hpet_broadcast_enter(void)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id()
timer_deadline is only ever updated via this_cpu() in timer_softirq_action(),
so is not going to change behind the back of the currently running cpu.
Update hpet_broadcast_{enter,exit}() to use this_cpu() rather than per_cpu()
for clarity, and cache the value in a local variable to avoid the repea
