> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com]
> Sent: 26 June 2017 14:04
> To: Jan Beulich
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant
> ; xen-devel ;
> Lars Kurth
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: re-arrange how/when we do disk I/O
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/06/17 17:59, Julien
Hi,
On 12/06/17 17:59, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 12/06/17 16:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.06.17 at 17:11, wrote:
We place the trampoline no lower than at 256k, so we have ample space
to read the MBRs of BIOS disks into an aligned buffer right below the
trampoline (not doing so has been
Hi Jan,
On 12/06/17 16:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.06.17 at 17:11, wrote:
We place the trampoline no lower than at 256k, so we have ample space
to read the MBRs of BIOS disks into an aligned buffer right below the
trampoline (not doing so has been found to be a problem on a buggy BIOS
coming
On 12/06/17 16:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
> We place the trampoline no lower than at 256k, so we have ample space
> to read the MBRs of BIOS disks into an aligned buffer right below the
> trampoline (not doing so has been found to be a problem on a buggy BIOS
> coming with a Skull Canyon NUC). To facil
>>> On 12.06.17 at 17:11, wrote:
> We place the trampoline no lower than at 256k, so we have ample space
> to read the MBRs of BIOS disks into an aligned buffer right below the
> trampoline (not doing so has been found to be a problem on a buggy BIOS
> coming with a Skull Canyon NUC). To facilitat
We place the trampoline no lower than at 256k, so we have ample space
to read the MBRs of BIOS disks into an aligned buffer right below the
trampoline (not doing so has been found to be a problem on a buggy BIOS
coming with a Skull Canyon NUC). To facilitate that move MBR reading
past EDD info retr
