On 12/14/2015 02:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.12.15 at 17:50, wrote:
On 12/10/2015 11:53 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Especially given that PVH dom0 is not booting for me, as I just found
out:
...
(XEN) d0v0 EPT violation 0x1aa (-w-/r-x) gpa 0x00c0008116 mfn
0xc0008 type 5
(XEN) d0v0 Wal
>>> On 11.12.15 at 17:50, wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 11:53 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Especially given that PVH dom0 is not booting for me, as I just found
>> out:
>>
>> ...
>> (XEN) d0v0 EPT violation 0x1aa (-w-/r-x) gpa 0x00c0008116 mfn
>> 0xc0008 type 5
>> (XEN) d0v0 Walking EPT tables for
On 12/10/2015 11:53 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Especially given that PVH dom0 is not booting for me, as I just found
out:
...
(XEN) d0v0 EPT violation 0x1aa (-w-/r-x) gpa 0x00c0008116 mfn
0xc0008 type 5
(XEN) d0v0 Walking EPT tables for GFN c0008:
(XEN) d0v0 epte 80082bf50007
(XE
>>> On 10.12.15 at 17:53, wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 07:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.12.15 at 15:20, wrote:
>>> The tables are almost identical and therefore there is little reason to
>>> keep both sets.
>>>
>>> PVH needs 3 extra hypercalls:
>>> * mmuext_op. PVH uses MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI a
On 12/10/2015 07:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.12.15 at 15:20, wrote:
The tables are almost identical and therefore there is little reason to
keep both sets.
PVH needs 3 extra hypercalls:
* mmuext_op. PVH uses MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI and MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI to
optimize TLB flushing. Since
>>> On 08.12.15 at 15:20, wrote:
> The tables are almost identical and therefore there is little reason to
> keep both sets.
>
> PVH needs 3 extra hypercalls:
> * mmuext_op. PVH uses MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI and MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI to
> optimize TLB flushing. Since HVMlite guests may decide to us
The tables are almost identical and therefore there is little reason to
keep both sets.
PVH needs 3 extra hypercalls:
* mmuext_op. PVH uses MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI and MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI to
optimize TLB flushing. Since HVMlite guests may decide to use them as
well we can allow these two comman
