>>> On 28.06.16 at 19:20, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:03:57AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ld associates __init_end, placed outside of any section by the linker
>> script, with the following section, resulting in a huge (wrapped, as it
>> would be negative) section relative offset. COFF sy
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:03:57AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ld associates __init_end, placed outside of any section by the linker
> script, with the following section, resulting in a huge (wrapped, as it
> would be negative) section relative offset. COFF symbol tables store
> section relative ad
On 28/06/16 17:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>>> @@ -40,9 +40,20 @@ SECTIONS
>>> #if !defined(EFI)
>>>. = __XEN_VIRT_START;
>>>__image_base__ = .;
>>> +#else
>>> + . = __image_base__;
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#if 0
>>> +/*
>>> + * W
>>> On 28.06.16 at 16:26, wrote:
> On 28/06/16 15:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ld associates __init_end, placed outside of any section by the linker
>> script, with the following section, resulting in a huge (wrapped, as it
>> would be negative) section relative offset.
>
> So in this case, the caus
On 28/06/16 15:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ld associates __init_end, placed outside of any section by the linker
> script, with the following section, resulting in a huge (wrapped, as it
> would be negative) section relative offset.
So in this case, the cause of the truncation is due to __init_end be
ld associates __init_end, placed outside of any section by the linker
script, with the following section, resulting in a huge (wrapped, as it
would be negative) section relative offset. COFF symbol tables store
section relative addresses, and hence the above leads to assembler
truncation warnings w
