Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/Dom0: Don't allow dom0_max_vcpus to be zero

2015-04-14 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 04/14/2015 03:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.04.15 at 22:59, wrote: On 09/04/2015 21:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: In case dom0_max_vcpus is incorrectly specified on boot line make sure we will still boot. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky Good catch - lets not do that. Reviewed-by: Andrew C

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/Dom0: Don't allow dom0_max_vcpus to be zero

2015-04-14 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 09.04.15 at 22:59, wrote: > On 09/04/2015 21:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> In case dom0_max_vcpus is incorrectly specified on boot line make sure >> we will still boot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky > > Good catch - lets not do that. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper I see it got c

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/Dom0: Don't allow dom0_max_vcpus to be zero

2015-04-09 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 09/04/2015 21:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > In case dom0_max_vcpus is incorrectly specified on boot line make sure > we will still boot. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky Good catch - lets not do that. Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > --- > xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed,

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/Dom0: Don't allow dom0_max_vcpus to be zero

2015-04-09 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
In case dom0_max_vcpus is incorrectly specified on boot line make sure we will still boot. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c index e5c845c..378e650 100644