On Tue, Jul 21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Taking it to mean "all maintained", that's possible, but since I can't
> immediately see the point I'd like to ask for some justification. Us -
> SUSE - apparently being the only consumer of that code, and us
> not using Xen 4.4 together with Linux 4.1, and our
>>> On 21.07.15 at 08:52, wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> >>> On 01.06.15 at 15:56, wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> It's being removed in Linux 4.1.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> >
>> > Not sure who should, but:
>>
>> I gue
On Mon, Jun 01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.06.15 at 15:56, wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> It's being removed in Linux 4.1.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> >
> > Not sure who should, but:
>
> I guess no-one really needs to for that old code. Bu
>>> On 01.06.15 at 15:56, wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> It's being removed in Linux 4.1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> Not sure who should, but:
I guess no-one really needs to for that old code. But thanks!
Jan
_
It's being removed in Linux 4.1.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c
+++ b/unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c
@@ -350,11 +350,13 @@ int xen_irq_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22)
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It's being removed in Linux 4.1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Not sure who should, but:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-d
