On 09/10/15 05:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
>
> Andrew, which of those does your xen_bugtool use?
Currently just xc.domain_getinfo()
~Andrew
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 10/09/2015 11:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 06:42 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Is it okay to remove all of the unused bindings?
Please can you remind me what your motivation is here, just cleaning up
detritus or are some of these bindings actively hindering work you are
d
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 06:42 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Is it okay to remove all of the unused bindings?
Please can you remind me what your motivation is here, just cleaning up
detritus or are some of these bindings actively hindering work you are
doing? Or are they known to be broken?
If it's
On 10/08/2015 06:32 PM, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 10/08/2015 11:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 11:09 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 10/08/2015 10:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
We use these extentions along with xend XMLRPC API/
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:32:44PM -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 11:09 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2015 10:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> We use these ex
On 10/08/2015 11:27 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 11:09 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
>> On 10/08/2015 10:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
We use these extentions along with xend XMLRPC API/xm. Even when move
to
xl,
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 11:09 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 10:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> > > We use these extentions along with xend XMLRPC API/xm. Even when move
> > > to
> > > xl, this will give us a choice to reserve some l
On 10/08/2015 10:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
>> We use these extentions along with xend XMLRPC API/xm. Even when move to
>> xl, this will give us a choice to reserve some logic.
>
> There are a lot of interfaces here, are you using all of the
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:24 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> We use these extentions along with xend XMLRPC API/xm. Even when move to
> xl, this will give us a choice to reserve some logic.
There are a lot of interfaces here, are you using all of them? If not then
could you enumerate the ones you care
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 06:16 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> [0] although we are still waiting for Konrad's reply on that one in
> > > the
> > > relevant thread.
> >
> > RIP PV superpages.
>
> Okay, I'll do this as soon as Roger's domain builder patches are
> committed.
I think the ones which might
On 10/08/2015 03:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 18:14 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
The original motivation was to get rid of the "superpages" option when
building a pv-domU.
It's suffered rather from feat
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:24:22PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 18:14 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> > The original motivation was to get rid of the "superpages" option when
> > building a pv-domU.
>
> It's suffered rather from feature creep then, since removing that one
>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Remove lots of functions in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c as they
> > are not used anywhere in the tree. In fact only one function is still
> > being used from pygrub, n
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:31 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 06/10/15 16:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > > On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2015-10-0
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:38:42PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:31 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > On 06/10/15 16:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:38:08PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/15 16:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 18:14 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The original motivation was to get rid of the "superpages" option when
> building a pv-domU.
It's suffered rather from feature creep then, since removing that one
interface seems like much less of a problem[0] than a wholesale skewering
of
On 10/06/2015 05:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:30 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
On 10/06/2015 11:26 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross w
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:30 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 11:26 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > > > On 10/06/2015
On 06/10/15 16:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei L
On 10/06/2015 11:26 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100,
On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
load shared library into pyth
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 17:21 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And for th
On 10/06/2015 10:51 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>>> And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
>>> load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" module in 2.7 and
>
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > > And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
> > > load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" m
On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" module in 2.7 and
"ctypes" module in 3.x.
Possible, but not especially con
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
> load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" module in 2.7 and
> "ctypes" module in 3.x.
Possible, but not especially convenient since you need to convert the C
pr
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:33:54PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 01:18 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>Remove lots of functions in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c as they
> >>are not used anywhere in the tree. In fact only one
On 10/06/2015 01:18 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Remove lots of functions in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c as they
are not used anywhere in the tree. In fact only one function is still
being used from pygrub, namely "xeninfo". All other us
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Remove lots of functions in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c as they
> are not used anywhere in the tree. In fact only one function is still
> being used from pygrub, namely "xeninfo". All other users seem to have
> gone with nuking
Remove lots of functions in tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c as they
are not used anywhere in the tree. In fact only one function is still
being used from pygrub, namely "xeninfo". All other users seem to have
gone with nuking xm/xend.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
tools/python/xen/lowlevel/
31 matches
Mail list logo
