Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH] tools: libxl: allow permissive qemu-upstream pci
passthrough."):
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> want this for 4.6.
I have backported this, and the corresponding doc
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: libxl: allow
permissive qemu-upstream pci passthrough."):
> All the QEMU side XSA-131 patches are already in the qemu-xen 4.3, 4.4
> and 4.5 trees.
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Ian, Can
All the QEMU side XSA-131 patches are already in the qemu-xen 4.3, 4.4
and 4.5 trees.
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Ian, Can you backport this to 4.5 and earlier please.
>
> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:49 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrot
Ian, Can you backport this to 4.5 and earlier please.
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:49 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> want this for 4.6.
>
> > From c395657b03a1e2b7616d987e7
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 14:40 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> > want this for 4.6.
> >
> > > From c395657b0
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> want this for 4.6.
>
> > From c395657b03a1e2b7616d987e7078694874981979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Fro
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> want this for 4.6.
>
> > From c395657b03a1e2b7616d987e7078694874981979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Fro
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
> want this for 4.6.
As someone who has had dealings with the libxl side of hte
"permissive" flag, I'll certainly A
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Anyone fancy (n)acking this followup to XSA-131? I think we probably
want this for 4.6.
> From c395657b03a1e2b7616d987e7078694874981979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ian Campbell
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:32:23 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] t
