>>> On 05.04.17 at 15:27, wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: Add
> -Wno-bool-operation"):
>> I'm fairly sure this will break the Clang build.
>
> This seems unlikely. I assume that clang has the same behaviour as
&g
On 05/04/17 14:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/04/17 14:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: Add
>> -Wno-bool-operation"):
>>> I'm fairly sure this will break the Clang build.
>> This seems unlikel
On 05/04/17 14:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: Add
> -Wno-bool-operation"):
>> I'm fairly sure this will break the Clang build.
> This seems unlikely.
Have you tried?
> I assume that clang has the same b
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: Add
-Wno-bool-operation"):
> I'm fairly sure this will break the Clang build.
This seems unlikely. I assume that clang has the same behaviour as
gcc, for -Wno-unknown-warning.
> Furthermore, the proper fix
On 05/04/17 14:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This suppresses a warning from GCC7
> xenstored_domain.c:949:32: error: increment of a boolean expression
>
> We have not yet 100% concluded that this should not be fixed by
> changing the `_Bool b; b++;' to `b = 1'. But this fixes the warning
> and thus t
This suppresses a warning from GCC7
xenstored_domain.c:949:32: error: increment of a boolean expression
We have not yet 100% concluded that this should not be fixed by
changing the `_Bool b; b++;' to `b = 1'. But this fixes the warning
and thus the build for now, and we want to apply the XSA-20
