On 30/08/16 10:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Within compat_memory_op() this needs to be placed in the first switch()
> statement, or it ends up being dead code (as that first switch() has a
> default case chaining to compat_arch_memory_op()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
On 08/30/2016 01:05 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.08.16 at 11:46, wrote:
>> On 08/30/2016 12:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Within compat_memory_op() this needs to be placed in the first switch()
>>> statement, or it ends up being dead code (as that first switch() has a
>>> default case chainin
>>> On 30.08.16 at 11:46, wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 12:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Within compat_memory_op() this needs to be placed in the first switch()
>> statement, or it ends up being dead code (as that first switch() has a
>> default case chaining to compat_arch_memory_op()).
>>
>> Signed-off
On 08/30/2016 12:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Within compat_memory_op() this needs to be placed in the first switch()
> statement, or it ends up being dead code (as that first switch() has a
> default case chaining to compat_arch_memory_op()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> Compile tested
Within compat_memory_op() this needs to be placed in the first switch()
statement, or it ends up being dead code (as that first switch() has a
default case chaining to compat_arch_memory_op()).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
Compile tested only.
--- a/xen/common/compat/memory.c
+++ b/xen/common/
