At 11:31 + on 05 Dec (1417775465), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
> suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
> work if resumed on a hyp
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:31 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
> suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
> work if resumed on a hypervi
On 05/12/14 15:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.12.14 at 16:01, wrote:
>> On 05/12/14 14:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.12.14 at 15:36, wrote:
On 05/12/14 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
> of the hypercall inte
>>> On 05.12.14 at 16:01, wrote:
> On 05/12/14 14:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.12.14 at 15:36, wrote:
>>> On 05/12/14 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A gues
On 05/12/14 14:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.12.14 at 15:36, wrote:
>> On 05/12/14 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
>>> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
>>> suspended for migration in the mid
>>> On 05.12.14 at 15:36, wrote:
> On 05/12/14 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
>> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
>> suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
>> work
On 05/12/14 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
> of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
> suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
> work if resumed on a hypervisor using a diff
Andrew validly points out that even if these masks aren't a formal part
of the hypercall interface, we aren't free to change them: A guest
suspended for migration in the middle of a continuation would fail to
work if resumed on a hypervisor using a different value. Hence add
respective comments to
