On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 10:24 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:15:35AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:06:17AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 20:02 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update fi
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:15:35AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:06:17AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 20:02 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update first test
> > > case to expect return value 1 instead of 25
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:06:17AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 20:02 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update first test
> > case to expect return value 1 instead of 255.
> >
> > The parser now doesn't generate output for default va
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 20:02 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update first test
> case to expect return value 1 instead of 255.
>
> The parser now doesn't generate output for default values. Remove them
> from expected output.
This it looks good.
> The "d
The block-attach command now returns 1 when fails. Update first test
case to expect return value 1 instead of 255.
The parser now doesn't generate output for default values. Remove them
from expected output.
The "discard=" variant is never not supported, so delete two test cases
with that variant