On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Wei Liu wrote:
> > After 9c635883 ("ARM64: fix libxl build, do not include
> > ../../xen/include") there is nothing special needed to build
> > libxl_arm_acpi.o. Remove the explicit rule, use predefined one.
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Wei Liu wrote:
> After 9c635883 ("ARM64: fix libxl build, do not include
> ../../xen/include") there is nothing special needed to build
> libxl_arm_acpi.o. Remove the explicit rule, use predefined one.
>
> Build tested on ARM64.
>
> Suggested-by: Steve Capper
> Signed-off-by
Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH] libxl: remove explicit rule for libxl_arm_acpi.o"):
> After 9c635883 ("ARM64: fix libxl build, do not include
> ../../xen/include") there is nothing special needed to build
> libxl_arm_acpi.o. Remove the explicit rule, use predefined one.
>
> Build tested on ARM64.
>
> Su
After 9c635883 ("ARM64: fix libxl build, do not include
../../xen/include") there is nothing special needed to build
libxl_arm_acpi.o. Remove the explicit rule, use predefined one.
Build tested on ARM64.
Suggested-by: Steve Capper
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Stefano Stabelli
