On 4/5/16 9:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_restore accepts a
> new argument. Update libvirt's libxl driver for that. Use the macro
> provided by libxenlight to detect which version should be used.
>
> The new parameter (send_back_fd) is set to -1 becaus
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:12:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxl: libxl_domain_create_restore has an extra
> argument"):
> > CC Jim as well
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_r
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxl: libxl_domain_create_restore has an extra
argument"):
> CC Jim as well
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_restore accepts a
> > new argument. Update libvirt's libxl driver for that
CC Jim as well
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_restore accepts a
> new argument. Update libvirt's libxl driver for that. Use the macro
> provided by libxenlight to detect which version should be used.
>
> The new param
In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_restore accepts a
new argument. Update libvirt's libxl driver for that. Use the macro
provided by libxenlight to detect which version should be used.
The new parameter (send_back_fd) is set to -1 because libvirt provides
no such fd.
Signed-off-b
