On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:22 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:39 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > assert is not async-signal-safe.
>
> I don't doubt you, but I'm curious regarding a reference.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/assert.html doe
> sn
> 't
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:39 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> assert is not async-signal-safe.
I don't doubt you, but I'm curious regarding a reference.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/assert.html doesn
't appear to be it, unless it is too subtle for me.
> In practice the eff
assert is not async-signal-safe.
In practice the effect of calling assert there is that if the
assertion fails we might get a secondary crash, or other undesirable
behaviour from stdio (which is how assert usually reports failures).
Mention in a comment in libxl__self_pipe_wakeup that it has to b
