>>> On 22.03.16 at 18:23, wrote:
> On 22/03/16 14:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.03.16 at 14:48, wrote:
@@ -300,9 +304,9 @@ static void xc_cpuid_config_xsave(xc_int
{
case 0:
/* EAX: low 32bits of xfeature_enabled_mask */
-regs[0] = info->x
On 22/03/16 14:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.03.16 at 14:48, wrote:
>>> @@ -300,9 +304,9 @@ static void xc_cpuid_config_xsave(xc_int
>>> {
>>> case 0:
>>> /* EAX: low 32bits of xfeature_enabled_mask */
>>> -regs[0] = info->xfeature_mask & 0x;
>>> +re
>>> On 22.03.16 at 14:48, wrote:
>> @@ -300,9 +304,9 @@ static void xc_cpuid_config_xsave(xc_int
>> {
>> case 0:
>> /* EAX: low 32bits of xfeature_enabled_mask */
>> -regs[0] = info->xfeature_mask & 0x;
>> +regs[0] &= info->xfeature_mask;
>> /*
On 22/03/16 13:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> - don't unintentionally increase features reported by sub-leaf 0
> EDX:EAX
> - don't discard the known flags in sub-leaves 2..63 ECX
> - handle components 32...62 (EDX) in sub-leaf 1 consistently with
> 0...31 (ECX)
> - zap sub-leaves beyond 62
>
> Signed
- don't unintentionally increase features reported by sub-leaf 0
EDX:EAX
- don't discard the known flags in sub-leaves 2..63 ECX
- handle components 32...62 (EDX) in sub-leaf 1 consistently with
0...31 (ECX)
- zap sub-leaves beyond 62
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
While obviously requiring r
