On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:02:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.05.17 at 18:20, wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:52:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> The rule for headers++.chk wants to move headers++.chk.new to the
> >> designated target, which means we have to create that file in
Hi Jan,
On 12/05/17 07:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
The rule for headers++.chk wants to move headers++.chk.new to the
designated target, which means we have to create that file in the first
place.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Release-acked-by: Julien Grall
Cheers,
--- a/xen/include/Makefile
+++
>>> On 12.05.17 at 18:20, wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:52:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The rule for headers++.chk wants to move headers++.chk.new to the
>> designated target, which means we have to create that file in the first
>> place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> Reviewed
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:52:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The rule for headers++.chk wants to move headers++.chk.new to the
> designated target, which means we have to create that file in the first
> place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu
If I were to fix it I would ju
The rule for headers++.chk wants to move headers++.chk.new to the
designated target, which means we have to create that file in the first
place.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/include/Makefile
+++ b/xen/include/Makefile
@@ -120,7 +120,10 @@ headers99.chk: $(PUBLIC_C99_HEADERS) Mak
heade
