On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 02:45 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 1:38 PM >>>
>>> On 06/27/2017 02:26 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 10:32 AM >>>
> On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 06/27/2017 02:45 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 1:38 PM >>>
>> On 06/27/2017 02:26 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 10:32 AM >>>
On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
>> There is also a diffe
>>> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 1:38 PM >>>
>On 06/27/2017 02:26 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 10:32 AM >>>
>>> On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
> There is also a difference in timing; vm_event_init_domain() is called
On 06/27/2017 02:26 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 10:32 AM >>>
>> On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
There is also a difference in timing; vm_event_init_domain() is called
when vm_event is started on the domain, no
>>> Razvan Cojocaru 06/27/17 10:32 AM >>>
>On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
>>> There is also a difference in timing; vm_event_init_domain() is called
>>> when vm_event is started on the domain, not when the domain is
>>> constructed. IMO, the t
On 06/27/2017 09:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
>> There is also a difference in timing; vm_event_init_domain() is called
>> when vm_event is started on the domain, not when the domain is
>> constructed. IMO, the two should happen at the same time to be
>> consi
>>> Andrew Cooper 06/26/17 5:11 PM >>>
>There is also a difference in timing; vm_event_init_domain() is called
>when vm_event is started on the domain, not when the domain is
>constructed. IMO, the two should happen at the same time to be
>consistent. I'm not fussed at which point, as it would b
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 26/06/17 15:52, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
>> wrote:
>>> Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
>>> are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
On 26/06/17 15:52, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
> wrote:
>> Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
>> are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
>> previously only initialized some time after the domain was
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
> are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
> previously only initialized some time after the domain was created,
> in vm_event_enable(). This patch init
On 06/26/2017 03:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Razvan: I'd reword this to not mention livepatching. Simply having
> list_empty() working is a good enough reason alone.
Fair enough, I'll change the patch description as soon as we hear from
Tamas, so that I might address as many comments as possibl
On 26/06/17 12:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On June 26, 2017 5:48:17 AM EDT, Razvan Cojocaru
> wrote:
>> Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
>> are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
>
> Hmm, it wants to? Is there an missing patch that h
On 06/26/2017 02:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On June 26, 2017 5:48:17 AM EDT, Razvan Cojocaru
> wrote:
>> Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
>> are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
>
>
> Hmm, it wants to? Is there an missing pat
On June 26, 2017 5:48:17 AM EDT, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
>Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
>are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
Hmm, it wants to? Is there an missing patch that hasn't been posted for this?
If you mean to post this _bef
Pending livepatch code wants to check if the vm_event wait queues
are active, and this is made harder by the fact that they were
previously only initialized some time after the domain was created,
in vm_event_enable(). This patch initializes the lists immediately
after xzalloc()ating the vm_event m
15 matches
Mail list logo
