On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 09:44 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 01.12.15 at 17:34, wrote:
> > > On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >
> > > For one build run, yes. But then you can (a) build individual object
> > > files and (b) as mentioned above change configuration (implying
>>> On 01.12.15 at 17:34, wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> For one build run, yes. But then you can (a) build individual object
>> files and (b) as mentioned above change configuration (implying
>> that you know what you're doing). Also you could, using the
>> exam
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> For one build run, yes. But then you can (a) build individual object
> files and (b) as mentioned above change configuration (implying
> that you know what you're doing). Also you could, using the
> example above, do a kexec=y build, then a k
>>> On 01.12.15 at 16:52, wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 6:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
> On 30.11.15 at 18:29, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/Rules.mk
>>> +++ b/xen/Rules.mk
>>> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ FORCE:
>>>
>>> .PHONY: clean
>>> clean:: $(addprefix _clean_, $(subdir-all))
>>> - rm -f *.o *~ core
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 6:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 30.11.15 at 18:29, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/Rules.mk
>> +++ b/xen/Rules.mk
>> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ FORCE:
>>
>> .PHONY: clean
>> clean:: $(addprefix _clean_, $(subdir-all))
>> -rm -f *.o *~ core $(DEPS)
>> +rm -f *.o *~ core $(DEPS)
>>> On 30.11.15 at 18:29, wrote:
> --- a/xen/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/Rules.mk
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ FORCE:
>
> .PHONY: clean
> clean:: $(addprefix _clean_, $(subdir-all))
> - rm -f *.o *~ core $(DEPS)
> + rm -f *.o *~ core $(DEPS) $(obj-y)
While for the moment it would do, using a minima
In commit 8b6ef9c152edceabecc7f90c811cd538a7b7a110,
several files in xen/common/compat were changed to be built
using the Makefile in xen/common, by appending the compat
prefix to the object files. Additionally, the
xen/common/compat directory was removed from the subdirs-y
variable, so it is no lo
