On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:14:06AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 6:06 PM
> >
> > Accepting zero here even when !cpu_has_mpx makes the restore side
> > symmetric to the save logic (which avoids saving the value if zero),
>
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 6:06 PM
>
> Accepting zero here even when !cpu_has_mpx makes the restore side
> symmetric to the save logic (which avoids saving the value if zero),
> i.e. makes either side independent of the logic on the other side.
>
>
On 30/05/16 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Accepting zero here even when !cpu_has_mpx makes the restore side
> symmetric to the save logic (which avoids saving the value if zero),
> i.e. makes either side independent of the logic on the other side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Andrew
Accepting zero here even when !cpu_has_mpx makes the restore side
symmetric to the save logic (which avoids saving the value if zero),
i.e. makes either side independent of the logic on the other side.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@
