Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all

2015-07-02 Thread George Dunlap
On 06/30/2015 06:36 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > SEDF has been broken and unmaintained at least > until Xen 4.2, and most likely even before! Tests > are failing without anyonce caring, and yet we're > keeping using test resources for them. > > Let's stop doing this! > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all

2015-06-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all"): > Following up this discussion: > http://osdir.com/ml/general/2015-06/msg38502.html > > Here's the patch that kills SEDF from OSSTest entirely. > > Here it comes a diff

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all

2015-06-30 Thread Dario Faggioli
Following up this discussion: http://osdir.com/ml/general/2015-06/msg38502.html Here's the patch that kills SEDF from OSSTest entirely. Here it comes a diff of the generated runvars fo a few branches, which looks fine to me (just a bung of SEDF runvars/jobs removal) Regards, Dario --- --- runvar

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all

2015-06-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all"): > SEDF has been broken and unmaintained at least > until Xen 4.2, and most likely even before! Tests > are failing without anyonce caring, and yet we're > keeping using test resources for them. > > Let's stop doing this! Acked-b

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] OSSTest: stop testing SEDF at all

2015-06-30 Thread Dario Faggioli
SEDF has been broken and unmaintained at least until Xen 4.2, and most likely even before! Tests are failing without anyonce caring, and yet we're keeping using test resources for them. Let's stop doing this! Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli --- diff --git a/allow.all b/allow.all index 88a3038..806