On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:55:35AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
> fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
> extension type to it), so it gets moved out right to common struct
> domain.
>
> Signed-off
Hi Jan,
On 02/05/16 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
extension type to it), so it gets moved out right to common struct
domain.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
For
On 03/05/16 11:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 03/05/16 10:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.05.16 at 11:36, wrote:
On 02/05/16 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
extensio
On 03/05/16 10:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.05.16 at 11:36, wrote:
>> On 02/05/16 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> ... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
>>> fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
>>> extension type to it), so it gets
>>> On 03.05.16 at 11:36, wrote:
> On 02/05/16 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
>> fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
>> extension type to it), so it gets moved out right to common struct
>> domain
On 02/05/16 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
> fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
> extension type to it), so it gets moved out right to common struct
> domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Yikes
... and hence should not live in the HVM part of the PV/HVM union. In
fact it's not even architecture specific (there already is a per-arch
extension type to it), so it gets moved out right to common struct
domain.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
Of course this is quite large a patch for 4.7, but