On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 06:02:54PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpumap setting before passing to
> XEN"):
> > So what is the conclusion of this discussion so far? I admit I'm a bit
> > lost here.
>
> Undoubte
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpumap setting before passing to
XEN"):
> So what is the conclusion of this discussion so far? I admit I'm a bit
> lost here.
Undoubtedly:
* That "xm ..." generates the reported error is definitely a bug.
* "xm&qu
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:54:32AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> On 2016/4/25 21:26, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpumap setting
> >before passing to XEN"):
> >>On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Wei Li
On 2016/4/25 21:26, Ian Jackson wrote:
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpumap setting before
passing to XEN"):
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
In principle I think having python binding and xl/libxl behave more or less
the same is
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix cpumap setting
before passing to XEN"):
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > In principle I think having python binding and xl/libxl behave more or less
> > the same is the right dir
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Sorry I was at the Xen hackathon in the last two days.
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:35:20AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> > 在 2016/4/11 19:27, Wei Liu 写道:
> > >On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> > >>It's t
Sorry I was at the Xen hackathon in the last two days.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:35:20AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> 在 2016/4/11 19:27, Wei Liu 写道:
> >On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> >>It's tool's duty to pass a correct cpumap to XEN. On a host with less than
On 2016/4/12 11:35, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
On 2016/4/11 19:27, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
It's tool's duty to pass a correct cpumap to XEN. On a host with
less than
64
CPUS, it just shows below error.
[root@localhost /]# xm vcpu-pin 3 all all
在 2016/4/11 19:27, Wei Liu 写道:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
It's tool's duty to pass a correct cpumap to XEN. On a host with less than
64
CPUS, it just shows below error.
[root@localhost /]# xm vcpu-pin 3 all all
Error: Cannot pin vcpu: 0 to cpu: [0, 1, 2, 3,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:42:57AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> It's tool's duty to pass a correct cpumap to XEN. On a host with less than
> 64
> CPUS, it just shows below error.
>
> [root@localhost /]# xm vcpu-pin 3 all all
> Error: Cannot pin vcpu: 0 to cpu: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
It's tool's duty to pass a correct cpumap to XEN. On a host with less
than 64
CPUS, it just shows below error.
[root@localhost /]# xm vcpu-pin 3 all all
Error: Cannot pin vcpu: 0 to cpu: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
11 matches
Mail list logo
