>>> On 24.07.15 at 18:09, wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 09:54 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
>> more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
>
> I don't think all 4.7 development needs to come to a halt just because we
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 09:54 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
> more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
I don't think all 4.7 development needs to come to a halt just because we
have frozen for 4.6. Although 4.6 should
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.07.15 at 17:39, wrote:
>> I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
>> settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
>> and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work
>>> On 24.07.15 at 17:39, wrote:
> I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
> settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
> and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work out
> the next version soon.
First of all, such a ping wo
Hi,
I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work out
the next version soon.
Best!
Chong
--
Chong Li
Department of Computer Science and Engi
