On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 01:31 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.09.17 at 19:20, wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
>
> Would you mind clarifying in a brief description whether this is just
> routine catch up, or to bring in any specific changes we need?
>
What we have right now,
>>> On 22.09.17 at 19:20, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Would you mind clarifying in a brief description whether this is just
routine catch up, or to bring in any specific changes we need?
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
Config.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Config.mk b/Config.mk
index bba81bee7d..57d3e2bc44 100644
--- a/Config.mk
+++ b/Config.mk
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ QEMU_TRADITIONAL_URL ?=
git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
SE
This new changeset contain a fix to build with GCC 6.3.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
Config.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Config.mk b/Config.mk
index f0ca9e9379..7a0f94b2f2 100644
--- a/Config.mk
+++ b/Config.mk
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ QEMU_TRADITIONAL_U
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:08:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The new osstest tested head contains a fix for gcc-4.4 toolchain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > ---
> > Cc: "Hao, Xudong"
> > Cc: Ian Campbell
> >
> > Please pull from
> >
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> The new osstest tested head contains a fix for gcc-4.4 toolchain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> ---
> Cc: "Hao, Xudong"
> Cc: Ian Campbell
>
> Please pull from
> git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git xen-tested-master
For future such updat
The new osstest tested head contains a fix for gcc-4.4 toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: "Hao, Xudong"
Cc: Ian Campbell
Please pull from
git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git xen-tested-master
and push the said commit to
git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git master
It should be a fast-f
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 15:16 +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> A recent ovmf patch (already tested) I think is good to backport is:
Pointing out backport candidates in the depths of a thread such as this is
a sure fire way to ensure they get missed I'm afraid.
Please make such requests explicitly in a
Il 23/10/2015 14:56, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 13:43 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
We have no existing stable baseline for that arch, and no testing or
reason to believe that cb9a7eb (the Config.mk version currently
referenced by 4.6) as being any good at all on that plat
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 13:43 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > We have no existing stable baseline for that arch, and no testing or
> > reason to believe that cb9a7eb (the Config.mk version currently
> > referenced by 4.6) as being any good at all on that platform,
> > whether we backport a coupl
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > changeset"):
> > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> changeset"):
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially
> > > taking them
> > > are explained in the refer
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If OVMF upstream do not have such a branch, we need to create one.
>
> That's fine. We need the new branch in osstest and somebody maintaining
> it.
Creating a push gate in os
>>> On 23.10.15 at 13:18, wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking them
>> > are explained in the referenced thread.
>
> That explana
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking
> > > them
> > > are explained in the referenced thread.
>
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Yes. Those (that?) and the reasons why we aren't just trivially taking them
> > are explained in the referenced thread.
That explanation isn't very convincing to me.
> I cann
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:01 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> > > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > > changeset"):
> > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > This was discus
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:01 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF
> > changeset"):
> > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > This was discussed prior to Wei submitting this patch, but I can't
>
>>> On 22.10.15 at 19:08, wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > This was discussed prior to Wei submitting this patch, but I can't remember
>> > the reference. Hopefully either Wei or Stefano does.
>>
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > This was discussed prior to Wei submitting this patch, but I can't remember
> > the reference. Hopefully either Wei or Stefano does.
>
> 1444832748.23192.213.ca...@citrix.com
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >
> > Acked + applied.
> >
> > Ian, I beleive Stefano would like to see this in 4.6 a
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 16:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > >
> > > Acked + applied.
> > >
> >
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >
> > Acked + applied.
> >
> > Ian, I beleive Stefano would like to see this i
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] Config.mk: update OVMF changeset"):
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>
> Acked + applied.
>
> Ian, I beleive Stefano would like to see this in 4.6 at some point.
...
> To ssh://xenbits.xen.org/home/xen/git/ovmf.git
>
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked + applied.
Ian, I beleive Stefano would like to see this in 4.6 at some point.
> ---
> Please pull from
>
> git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git xen-tested-master
>
> and push the aforementioned commit to
>
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Please pull from
git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git xen-tested-master
and push the aforementioned commit to
git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git master
It should be a fast-forward push.
---
Config.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi
26 matches
Mail list logo
