On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think it would be best if I proposed some code to you. I will get
> > back to you with a suggestion.
>
> Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
>
> NB that this is an RFC and I have NOT EXECUTED IT. It is ea
Robert Hu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST RFC PATCH 0/4] Nested job execution
infrastructure"):
> On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If you like the look of this approach, please feel free to fold these
> > patches into your own series at the appropriate point (retaining my
> > From:
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think it would be best if I proposed some code to you. I will get
> > back to you with a suggestion.
>
> Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
>
> NB that this is an RFC and I have NOT EXECUTED IT. It is ea
Ian Jackson writes ("[OSSTEST RFC PATCH 0/4] Nested job execution
infrastructure"):
> Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
Oh, I should say: I have put this on xenbits, for if you prefer a `git
fetch':
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/iwj/osstest.git;a=summary
git
I wrote:
> I think it would be best if I proposed some code to you. I will get
> back to you with a suggestion.
Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
NB that this is an RFC and I have NOT EXECUTED IT. It is easy in Tcl
to make daft mistakes like missing `global' or misspelling
