On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:34 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database
> schema updates"):
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I can put this in a comment if you like.
> >
> > I suppose a comment next to any such o
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database schema
updates"):
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I can put this in a comment if you like.
>
> I suppose a comment next to any such override is a pretty good policy to
> have.
OK. See below; I hav
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database
> schema updates"):
> > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > See schema/README.schema, introduced in this patch, for the design.
> >
> > The README
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database schema
updates"):
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > See schema/README.schema, introduced in this patch, for the design.
>
> The README looks good now, thanks.
Thanks.
> Code comments
> > diff -
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database schema
updates"):
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > It does say that updates are applied in order.
>
> Right I was considering an osstest repo with 01 and 03 in it, which is
> applied and all up to da
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database
> schema updates"):
> > It does say that updates are applied in order. I will add `and
> > monotonically increasing' after `unique'. [etc etc]
>
> Here is v3 of this patc
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 18:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database
> schema updates"):
> > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > + is a positive integer, which should be unique. Updates
> > > are
> > > +applied in or
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database schema
updates"):
> It does say that updates are applied in order. I will add `and
> monotonically increasing' after `unique'. [etc etc]
Here is v3 of this patch. I'll refrain from reposting the whole
series.
Ian.
>From a7
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 5/8] Schema: Support database schema
updates"):
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > + is a positive integer, which should be unique. Updates are
> > +applied in order.
>
> Don't these also need to be monotonically increasing over t
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 17:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> diff --git a/schema/README.updates b/schema/README.updates
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..622410c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/schema/README.updates
> @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
> +SCHEMA DEFINITION AND SCHEMA UPDATES (PRODUCTION `EXECUTIVE' MODE)
See schema/README.schema, introduced in this patch, for the design.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
---
v2: Slight increase schema update name length format.
Docs fixes:
Change erroneous `three' to `four'.
Change `state' to `status' throghout.
Explain scope of .
Sort out (and renum
11 matches
Mail list logo
