Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 01:17 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > make-flight | 36 ++-- FWIW the make-flight side of this looks fine to me. We discussed the save-restore allowances already. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-d

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:05 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > We don't need to make ts-migrate-support-check fail. It

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:03 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:33 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > By "test steps" you mean things like other ts-* within the same > > (vNUMA) > > job? Or something different, e.g., other tests on the same host, > > etc? > > Effectively rows in t

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > We don't need to make ts-migrate-support-check fail. It is fine for > > > the > > > actual migration test to fail a

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 10:33 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > We don't need to make ts-migrate-support-check fail. It is fine for > > > the > > > actual migration test to fail at the b

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > We don't need to make ts-migrate-support-check fail. It is fine for > > the > > actual migration test to fail at the beginning as it won't block > > the > > push gate. It's conceivable th

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 17:41 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:34:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Dario Faggioli writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the > > vNUMA HVM test job"): > > > as a variant of regular Debian HVM jobs. > > > > > > For now, the vNUMA topology

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-05 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:34:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Dario Faggioli writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM > test job"): > > as a variant of regular Debian HVM jobs. > > > > For now, the vNUMA topology is just hardcoded > > here, and it is 4 vCPUs and 2 vNUMA nod

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Dario Faggioli writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job"): > as a variant of regular Debian HVM jobs. > > For now, the vNUMA topology is just hardcoded > here, and it is 4 vCPUs and 2 vNUMA nodes. How > to split resources is left to the test > implementation (right

[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] make-flight: create the vNUMA HVM test job

2015-10-01 Thread Dario Faggioli
as a variant of regular Debian HVM jobs. For now, the vNUMA topology is just hardcoded here, and it is 4 vCPUs and 2 vNUMA nodes. How to split resources is left to the test implementation (right now, it is just evenly split them between the 2 virtual nodes). Note that we do not yet support save/r