Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 2/2] Executive DB: Reduce strength of
DB locks"):
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 16:23 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
> > not mean that the transactions are necessarily serialisable!
>
> ^does not?
Yes, thanks.
>
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 16:23 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The purpose of these locks is partly to prevent transactions being
> aborted (which I'm not sure the existing code would in practice cope
> with, although this is a bug) and also to avoid bugs due to the fact
> that
> SET TRANSACTION ISOLATI
The purpose of these locks is partly to prevent transactions being
aborted (which I'm not sure the existing code would in practice cope
with, although this is a bug) and also to avoid bugs due to the fact
that
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
not mean that the transactions are necess
