Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility"): > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Also of course this statement was, with my original patch, wrong, > > because osstest.git didn't contain a copy of any version of the > > vanilla GPL. I have added a

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility"): > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Also of course this statement was, with my original patch, wrong, > > > because osstest.git didn't contain

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility"): > > These days http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html recommends: > > > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > > along with

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility"): > These days http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html recommends: > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with Foobar. If not, see . I will fix

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:35 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Give this a GPLv2+ licence so that we can move it into some other > FLOSS package later. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Acked-by: Ian Campbell [...] > +#You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > +#w

[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 07/27] memoise: New utility

Give this a GPLv2+ licence so that we can move it into some other FLOSS package later. Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson --- memoise | 56 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100755 memoise diff --git a/memoise b/memoise new file mod