On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/7] Apropos of XTF: Improve failed step
> selection"):
> > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > -SELECT sum(finished-started)
> > > +SELECT su
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/7] Apropos of XTF: Improve failed step
selection"):
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > -SELECT sum(finished-started)
> > +SELECT sum(max(finished)-min(started))
...
> resourcecall DBD::Pg::st execute fa
On
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Running XTF in osstest is likely to produce failures where multiple
> > steps fail interestingly. We would like to prefer to report, and
> > bisect, earlier steps.
> >
> > This series does that.
> >
> > Wei, NB, this has a co
On 30/08/16 17:00, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Running XTF in osstest is likely to produce failures where multiple
>> steps fail interestingly. We would like to prefer to report, and
>> bisect, earlier steps.
>>
>> This series does that.
>>
>> W
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/7] Apropos of XTF: Improve failed step
selection"):
> The rebased patch is as followed, please check.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Thanks,
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xe
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Running XTF in osstest is likely to produce failures where multiple
> steps fail interestingly. We would like to prefer to report, and
> bisect, earlier steps.
>
> This series does that.
>
> Wei, NB, this has a conflict with the XTF
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Running XTF in osstest is likely to produce failures where multiple
> steps fail interestingly. We would like to prefer to report, and
> bisect, earlier steps.
>
> This series does that.
>
> Wei, NB, this has a conflict with the XTF
Running XTF in osstest is likely to produce failures where multiple
steps fail interestingly. We would like to prefer to report, and
bisect, earlier steps.
This series does that.
Wei, NB, this has a conflict with the XTF pre series that you have
taken over. The conflict is not trivial, but easy
