On 12/18/2014 02:38 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Just the fact that we are not doing anything to smoke test cpupools, while I
think we should. :-)
This add something quite basic, but it's, IMO, already representative one
typically does with cpupools. We can add more pCPU related tricks (removing,
a
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:38 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Just the fact that we are not doing anything to smoke test cpupools, while I
> think we should. :-)
>
> This add something quite basic, but it's, IMO, already representative one
> typically does with cpupools. We can add more pCPU related
Just the fact that we are not doing anything to smoke test cpupools, while I
think we should. :-)
This add something quite basic, but it's, IMO, already representative one
typically does with cpupools. We can add more pCPU related tricks (removing,
adding, etc), or we can add more domains and move
