On 16/07/15 11:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 11:36 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 16/07/15 11:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Sadly we lack a proper infrastructure for handing guest memory size
>>> and fitting it into the host. We don't currently even have in our
>>> database the a
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 11:36 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/07/15 11:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Sadly we lack a proper infrastructure for handing guest memory size
> > and fitting it into the host. We don't currently even have in our
> > database the amount of RAM the host has.
> >
> > The rec
On 16/07/15 11:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sadly we lack a proper infrastructure for handing guest memory size
> and fitting it into the host. We don't currently even have in our
> database the amount of RAM the host has.
>
> The recommended minimum for Windows is 2Gby. But we have (in the
> Cambrid
Sadly we lack a proper infrastructure for handing guest memory size
and fitting it into the host. We don't currently even have in our
database the amount of RAM the host has.
The recommended minimum for Windows is 2Gby. But we have (in the
Cambridge instance) some hosts which only have 4Gby. We
