Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
related test jobs"):
> Yes, here it comes. Sorry for the delay (wasn't working for most of last
> week). Any better?
Brilliant, thanks. LGTM.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Ian.
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:56 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize
> scheduling related test jobs"):
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This looks plausible but can you include the output of a diff between
> > >
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:10 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
> related test jobs"):
> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:56 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > That's what I meant, exactly. But looking at it shows that it would
> > > ben
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
related test jobs"):
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:56 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > That's what I meant, exactly. But looking at it shows that it would
> > benefit from being the output of
> > ./mg-show-flight-runvars sta
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 16:56 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize
> scheduling related test jobs"):
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This looks plausible but can you include the output of a diff between
> > >
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
related test jobs"):
> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This looks plausible but can you include the output of a diff between
> > the two sets of runvars, please ?
...
> I will put down here a d
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:52 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
> related test jobs"):
> > Scheduling related tests are ok to run on ARM, so do
> > not cut them off. They also do not depend on a
> > particular Dom0 architecture.
>
Dario Faggioli writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH] make-flight: reorganize scheduling
related test jobs"):
> Scheduling related tests are ok to run on ARM, so do
> not cut them off. They also do not depend on a
> particular Dom0 architecture.
>
> The net effect is that the following tests are removed:
> te
Scheduling related tests are ok to run on ARM, so do
not cut them off. They also do not depend on a
particular Dom0 architecture.
The net effect is that the following tests are removed:
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu
while the following new ones are created:
test-amd64
